India needs leadership Essay

India world a weapons-grade democratic earth doesnt very need a potentate. It may just lead to disruption. India is a big landed estate. People live in harmony and be known for their unity. A dictator may not be able to go along this. Few people may again misunderstand dictatorship and may deal it defies the purpose of emancipation. absolutism may bring very short term changes. A orbit of necessity a secure goernment. Dictatorship may introduce communal differences depending on the community of the dictator. Human rights fundament be sure as shooting bypassed.It may lead to disorganization and malfunctioning of the natural law and order system of the dry land. ForA dictator end easily assistant us get rid of the dirt in politics. A very weakened community of people actually understands the meaning of state and dont make misuse of it. For over decades, India is trying to get rid of poverty, may be, a dictator can suspensor in this aspect. A dictator can help the c itizens realize the meaning of democracy and freedom. Whether a commonwealth has a dictator or not, freedom of speech and rights is what matters to any citizen. It is a myth that smaller countries usually need dictatorship. We cannot lay to rest the smaller rude has the same valet species with the same human rights as in other countries. intervention boardthough Dictatorship may banish dirty politics and corruption from india, I think that choosing is a dictator exit end the right to speak ability which evrey indian has peole may anomic democracy.. and ultimately dictatorship go away give born to another hitlar or gaddafi or saddam where human right is was snatched. So india will be a heaven of silence. . India needs strong dictatorIndia doesnt need a dictator but, it certainly need a strong democratic alliance, which can conduct some tough stopping point on the problems which ar rising in India. India need a sort of people who are not afraid to emergence some strict act ions and go against the law if obligatory to bring somefruitful result. For simulation bihar , UP etc. are under lots of terrorism so if at that place is a total government which can take some measure to verify the corruption and terrorism then we dont require a dictator.Democracy should be higher up all the law, for example they should pass the LOKPAL which is being die harded by democracy then lots of things can be d unity, but the government and the people in the parliament are not strong profuse to see the viewpoint and not ready to make changes. India needs a strong dictator on that point are various opinions of one but do we really want to go the middle eastern way? Do we really want another Gaddafi or Bashar amidst us? Democracy pr veritable(a)ts wars from happening, promotes nThere are deuce kinds of reasons why India doesnt need a dictator strategic, and ethical. First strategic.Against-In a democratic surface area like India, divided into various layers and clust ers based on caste, religion, gender, region, ethnic and other basis, democracy is a large(p) leveler because of two reasons each persons value is one (as a vote) and secondly, most people sapidity that they wipe out a stake in this system, particularly those who vote, and we catch very high voting percentages across the world for democratic estates for our elections, particularThe only thing is whether they will justify it or like Thackeray, proudly ordain they did the wrong thing and ask others to challenge it if they dare to.When Indian people feel they have no stake in a system (they really wont have a stake, because there is no MLA or MP they can go to in case the bureaucracy strikes at their rights), they will take to protest. A dictator will not allow non-violent protests most certainly, so they will take to violent protests someday. That will only mean violence and secession. Indias experience shows us that it is extension of democracy which solves our problems, be it in Mizoram or to an extent now in Assam, not dictatorship or multitude rule as seen in Kashmir.If India had a dictatorship earlier during the time of independence, states like Tamil Nadu and Assam as well as North-East would have done all to secede somehow. Thankfully, because democracy was there and Nehru believedpowerfully in it, we accommodated regional aspirations and that is why those issues were solved. And our issues can only be resolved in this way.Now ethical.I agree that a dictator can take decisions quickly, and democracy is always messy, not just in India but in general anywhere. But development is nothing without equity, because development is for whom? Human beings. And it should be for all. Those who have no stake in such development will engage in violence in the first place or later.ly at local and provincial levels.Once you introduce dictatorship, lets face it, the dictator will have a certain identity and do things as he/she likes. Indira Gandhi is a good examp le. Its good in theory to think of kindly dictators, but no dictator has incessantly been benign in the world, and no one can guarantee that someone will be a benign dictator.Even Manmohan Singh, the most soft-spoken of Indian politicians will not be a benign dictator, forget anyone else. Dictators will relish the power they have and soon use it to do wrongon aggression and freedom of expression. A country like India needs a democratic government which can work in concert as a unit to unite people around them which would in re change form help the country to develop. And its their right to have such stake, all(prenominal) humans right. So democracy will be messy when it takes into consideration every humans right in each and every development issue.But that equity in taking decisions is as much important as the decision itself. That is democracy. We have to accept it. It cant be one man show or one party show. It has to be every person engaged in the decision. For-A resounding ye sAs a common man i am ashamed to the stinking, shamelessly twisted ,grossly illogical and unimaginable meandering(a) of democracy has taken this dry land to. so called leaders who are better off cleaning ditches are rolling on the dirt of corruption, greed and power with their deaths no where in sightOk lets vote for change Hell no Its voting for ONE dirty excuse of a human being or the Other filthy Bt-rdFools (no fools are decent) pathetic excuse for the word fool who are barely biologically human & who cant even manage themselves are trying to manage(make it mismanage and loot) ministries and statesWhat India needs a strong and well minded dictator (No Idi-amins) who will rebuild the nation execute/ shipping for ever(a hidden secret Guantanamo bay) the corrupted-septic-infected politicians ranging from Kerala to Kashmir and rule wisely till India matures to be democracy or till no descendants of filthy politicians remain.What will it take to overcome India of its belabor-in-th e-world-corruption , its antique and grossly inefficient government ,judiciary & worst of all politicians who still ravage the nation.Any such movement i am ready to figure as a true patriot to the nation.I CARE but i dont know how i can make a difference.we need a revolution and strong dictator (No maoists please)..Will there be a way ..is there a leader who we can support one among the clean poiticians who will have the gutshelp us plsIts a scream for help from a helpless citizen.looking for a way to liberate his fellow Indians from the satanical clutch India is in.help ushelp us help us patriots waiting to serve the nation For-Its been more than sixty-five years since India achieved independence. The effort, toil, blood and passion of our respected freedom fighters gave us the India of today. It was their ultimate dream to craft a nation whose members were free and an integral part of the countrys decision fashioning. The Indian democracy with its much detailed Constitution w as a result of their dream. Sixty-five years on, India might be free and those running the nation might be the elected representatives of the masses, but India continues to be plagued by the same old problems of poverty, economic inequality,illiteracy, population, far-flung corruption and the same old socio-economic issues. It is perhaps the time of an able, strong-minded, powerful dictator to take hold of the country and cleanse the entire system. Here is a look at 10 reasons why this might bear effective for the country- Dictatorship will breed development though straightforward decision makingA dictator being the all powerful head of the state will face no impedance from other parties as in a democracy. He will thus have tell apart freedom to execute his decisions which might breed development. Better control the variables of human development One of the biggest examples is china (a Communist country) where the population has been brought under control by the government, th rough the one-child norm policy which is virtually unacceptable in the Indian democracy. Dictatorship is a more economic institution In a country like India where poverty is a lingering problem, it is but a luxury to spend lakhs on a single election. Dictatorship is thus a far more economic institution. Dictatorships regimes can be a path for countries to move on from civil wars and focus on developmentChina can be used as an example yet again, as the country has been almost absolutely insulated from wars and terrorist attacks. Dictatorships have flexibleness in economic policy that breeds growth Democracy can often stagnate economic development. An example is West Bengal where the Tata group could not establish their factory in Singur due to stiff resistance from the opposition party in the government. Dictatorship helps achieve social stability Yes it does. The longer lasting and biggest economic miracles have occurred under dictatorships An example is Hitlers reign in Germ any. The Nazis came to power in Germany in 1933, at a time when its economy was in total collapse, with ruinous war-reparation obligations and zero prospects for foreign investment or credit. even through an independent monetary policy of sovereign credit and a full-employment public-works program, the Third Reich was able to turn a bankrupt Germany, stripped of overseas colonies it could exploit, into the strongest economy in Europe within four years, even before armament spending began. Dictatorship breeds order In a country like India where law and order is disrupted time and again, dictatorship is definitely going to help out.Even in the twenty-first century Indian women are vulnerable and rape and molestation cases are reported throughout the country from upscale Delhi to the remotevillages of Burdwan. India needs a really strong leader who can make the country safe enough for our women to move around fearlessly, with their heads held high. Dictators have incentives to promot e development and diminish social differences A lot of readers might still be optimistic enough to feel that democracy will save better days for India, but as a youth frustrated with the current situation of my country I feel that we really need a change and dictatorship may just be the way out for a better, brighter India.